I will synthesize a structured report assessing the feasibility of the multi-stage electric ductless fan for hypersonic flight. The report will include an evaluation of technological challenges, potential engineering solutions, and an analysis of why this propulsion concept has remained unexplored despite its high potential payoff. Additionally, it will trace prior and current research efforts in aerospace propulsion, power electronics, and high-speed aerodynamics to provide a justification for this new approach.
The final document will be structured for a lead project engineer, maintaining a balance of scientific and engineering rigor while being accessible for practical implementation. I'll update you when the report is ready.
The multi-stage electric ductless fan concept refers to an air-breathing propulsion system that uses multiple successive fan stages (like an axial compressor) driven by electric motors, without a traditional enclosing duct around the fan blades. In essence, it is akin to a series of high-speed propellers or unducted fans powered electrically, designed to compress and accelerate airflow from standstill up to hypersonic velocities. (Notably, “ductless fan” is often used synonymously with propfan or unducted fan technology – for example, 1980s studies showed open rotor “ductless” engines could improve subsonic cruise efficiency. Here we imagine extending that idea into the hypersonic regime.) The high-level vision is a fully electric hypersonic propulsion system that could operate efficiently across Mach 0 to Mach 15+, enabling aircraft to take off under electric power, accelerate to extreme speeds in the atmosphere, and potentially reach near-orbital velocities. Such a system would not rely on carrying onboard oxidizer (like a rocket), instead drawing in air for propulsion and using onboard electricity to drive the compression and thrust generation. This is conceptually similar to combining the advantages of a jet (air-breathing, efficient oxygen use) with advanced electric drivetrain control.
If achievable, the impact of an electric hypersonic propulsion system would be revolutionary. It promises airplane-like operations at speeds previously reserved for rockets. For instance, a hypersonic aircraft could cross oceans in under two hours or even serve as a reusable first stage for launching payloads to space. Boeing’s vision for a Mach 5 passenger plane envisions crossing the Atlantic in ~2 hours – a Mach 15 system could potentially shrink global travel times to under an hour. The system’s advantages would include:
In summary, the multi-stage electric ductless fan is an aspirational concept aiming to marry recent advances in electric drivetrains with hypersonic aerodynamics. The potential payoff – ultra-fast, efficient, and reusable hypersonic vehicles – justifies a thorough feasibility analysis. This report assesses the key engineering challenges, potential breakthroughs required, and the largely uncharted research territory surrounding this concept, in order to guide future investment and research directions.
Developing an electric ductless fan system for Mach 15+ flight presents formidable multidisciplinary challenges. This section examines the critical feasibility aspects: aerodynamics across the Mach range, power electronics and control, thermal and materials issues, structural integration, and validation strategies.
Blade aerodynamics across speeds: A fundamental challenge is ensuring the fan blades can operate effectively from subsonic up to hypersonic airflow. Conventional turbofan or propeller blades perform best with subsonic airflow over them; if incoming air is supersonic, shock waves and high drag drastically reduce efficiency. Jet engines thus slow incoming air to subsonic speeds (around Mach 0.4–0.5) via inlet shocks before it reaches the compressor blades. At very high flight Mach numbers, however, decelerating the air creates extreme stagnation pressures and temperatures (discussed under Thermal Challenges), and even the best blade designs would encounter strong shock waves. By Mach 5, for example, the airflow compression can largely be achieved via the vehicle’s speed (ram effect) alone, and traditional fan blades would “disintegrate” if directly exposed to such velocities. Indeed, proposals for Mach 5 aircraft plan to bypass or stow the turbofan at high speed, because beyond a certain Mach, “you don’t need fan blades to compress air… the speed of the craft does that for you.” In the Mach 15 concept, this issue is exponentially harder – Mach 15 airflow is not only supersonic but essentially hyper-sonic, generating intense shock structures.
To handle this, the multi-stage fan system would likely require variable geometry or operating modes. At lower speeds (takeoff, climb, transonic), the electric fans actively compress and accelerate air for thrust, functioning somewhat like a high-bypass turbofan (albeit without a duct). At higher speeds, the system might gradually transition: front stages could be throttled back or retracted to avoid excessive drag, and compression might rely more on shock-compression of incoming air with minimal blade interference. One radical possibility is that some fan stages could intentionally “windmill” or act as turbines at high Mach, extracting energy from the airflow (which is moving at extreme velocity relative to the vehicle) and converting it to electricity, which could then be sent to other stages or systems. This concept of power extraction from the airstream is analogous to how a conventional engine’s turbine extracts power from hot exhaust – except here it would be via an electric generator. It’s an unprecedented regime: blades in Mach 10–15 flow might function more like stationary shock inducers or energy exchangers than efficient aerofoils. Managing the shock waves is critical – each blade row could produce oblique or normal shocks. Poorly controlled, these shocks would lead to flow separation, unsteady forces, and possibly destructive vibration or buffeting on the rotors.
To mitigate these issues, advanced blade designs and flow control techniques are needed. Blades could be highly swept and tailored to generate weaker oblique shocks, and successive stages must be spaced and timed to allow shock structures to dissipate or align constructively. The use of counter-rotating stages might help cancel swirl and disturbances. In fact, multiple small stages may handle compression more gently than one big jump. Computational studies of supersonic axial compressors (done in the past for research up to Mach 2–3 flow) would need to be extended to these extreme conditions. Additionally, novel concepts like using plasmas or electromagnetic fields to manage shocks could come into play. With a high-power electric system onboard, one could envision energizing the airflow ahead of the fan (for example, using a plasma injection or a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) device) to precondition the flow. This was hinted at in prior concepts: the S-MAGJET hybrid engine concept proposed using “excess power… delivered to the nose for a plasma cone for sonic compression mitigation” – essentially using electrical energy to create a plasma that smooths out the bow shock and reduces the load on the engine. While highly experimental, such plasma flow control might be an enabling technology to reduce shock strength on the fan blades at hypersonic speed.
In summary, aerodynamically the concept faces a paradox: fans are excellent at low speeds and useless at very high speeds, yet this design attempts to span the entire range. A feasible solution will likely involve staged operation – the early fan stages providing thrust up to a moderate Mach, then possibly idling or reconfiguring at ultra-high Mach while later stages or other mechanisms continue to provide compression/thrust. Extensive CFD (computational fluid dynamics) analysis and maybe new aerodynamic tricks (like the plasma mitigation) would be required to ensure blade survivability and flow stability from Mach 0 to 15.
A cornerstone of this concept is the use of electric power transmission in place of mechanical shafts. In a traditional multi-stage jet engine, a central shaft or gear system fixes the relationship between compressor/turbine stages. Here, each fan stage (and potentially an energy extraction turbine stage) would have its own high-performance electric motor/generator, all tied together by a power management system. This allows independent RPM control of each stage and dynamic routing of power where needed – a flexibility that could dramatically widen the operating envelope. Prior visionary designs give some credence to this approach. For example, the proposed Supersonic-Magnetic Advanced Generation Jet (S-MAGJET) engine uses “superconducting electric turbine ring generators” to produce power from the exhaust, which then drives “multi-stage counter-rotating … electric bypass fans and … electric compressor” via independent motors. By decoupling the fan from the compressor spool, each can run at its optimal speed for a given flight condition, which was calculated to raise efficiency significantly (on the order of 70% improvement in that concept). Our hypersonic ductless fan would extend this idea: at low speed, you might power all stages to maximize thrust; at some intermediate speed, perhaps power is selectively diverted – e.g. the front stage could slow down to avoid choked flow while a rear stage speeds up to further compress already fast airflow, all coordinated by power electronics.
Power extraction and redistribution would work as follows. If the vehicle is in a regime where the airflow itself contains excess kinetic energy (e.g. very high Mach where ram pressure is enormous), one or more stages could act as generators – spinning from the force of the airflow and converting that mechanical power to electricity (much like a wind turbine). That electricity could be sent to other stages that still need to drive or could be used for other subsystems (for instance, active cooling pumps, or plasma generators for flow control). Essentially, the engine could internally balance power, using some fans as turbines (energy takers) and others as fans (energy givers) as the flight regime demands. This concept is analogous to the MGU-H system in Formula 1 race cars, where an electric motor-generator on the turbocharger can either boost the compressor or harvest power from the exhaust turbine depending on need. In practice, implementing this in an aircraft engine is very complex – the F1 example “didn’t work very well and was largely ignored” due to control difficulties. However, advances in high-power density electronics (like silicon-carbide or gallium-nitride transistors that can handle megawatts) and fast digital control might make it feasible now to actively manage multiple motor/generators in real time.
Key challenges for the power system include:
In short, advanced power electronics are an enabler and a challenge: they allow the multi-stage fans to operate at their individual peak efficiencies and even harvest energy in some regimes, but they demand breakthroughs in high-power, lightweight electrical systems. The encouraging news is that aerospace companies are already developing turboelectric and hybrid-electric engines in the supersonic domain. Astro Mechanica’s prototype engine, for example, splits a turbogenerator and electrically driven fan/compressor, demonstrating that independently powered compressor stages can work in practice. Our hypersonic application would be a far more extreme extension of this principle.
Thermal management is arguably the toughest feasibility hurdle for sustained hypersonic operation. At Mach 15, the stagnation temperature of the air (the temperature the air would reach if slowed to rest) is enormous – on the order of 8,000–10,000 K (comparable to the surface of the sun) depending on altitude. Even if the flow is not fully slowed to subsonic, any interaction with the vehicle or fan blades will generate intense shock waves and viscous heating. For context, at Mach 5 (one-third of our target speed), air entering an engine inlet can exceed 1,000 °C, which necessitated the development of a special precooler heat exchanger in the SABRE engine to cool the airflow in a fraction of a second. That precooler successfully dropped 1000 °C air to near ambient in 1/20th of a second in tests – an impressive feat using cryogenic fuel as the heat sink. For Mach 15, the thermal problem is far greater: even the best high-temperature materials (ceramics, refractory metals) cannot withstand direct exposure to stagnation temperatures in that range. The engine will face heat loads comparable to those on re-entry vehicles or rocket thrust chambers, but on rotating machinery which is even harder to cool.
Active cooling of the fan stages and other components is absolutely necessary. Potential strategies include:
Shock management ties directly into thermal issues. Shock waves not only compress and heat the air, they can concentrate heat flux on surfaces (e.g. where a shock hits a blade or the airframe). Managing where shocks impinge is critical. The engine intake could be designed to produce oblique shocks on a wedge or spike upstream, so that by the time the flow reaches the fans, a lot of the Mach 15 kinetic energy has been dissipated in a controlled manner. (This is similar to what ramjet/scramjet intakes do – a “cascade of shocks” compresses the air without moving parts.) Even so, the residual flow might still be supersonic when hitting the first fan stage, unless we fully shock it down to subsonic which, at Mach 15, would create enormous pressure and temperature rises. So likely a moderate approach: decelerate the flow partway (to maybe Mach 3–5 range) with external/internal shocks, then have the fans deal with the rest. Each fan stage will generate its own weaker shock if its blade tip speed or the relative flow is supersonic. Designing blades to minimize these internal shocks (through proper blade angle and perhaps flexibility or pivoting of blades) is an active research area in transonic compressor design and would need to be extrapolated.
One intriguing possibility to reduce shock intensity is the use of electromagnetic or plasma methods mentioned earlier. Because the engine is electric, it might generate strong electromagnetic fields or plasma discharges that can influence the flow. For example, an MHD accelerator or generator could be embedded: as the air (which may become partially ionized at Mach 15 due to extreme heating) flows through a magnetic field, one can add or extract energy from it without physical contact, potentially smoothing the shock or augmenting compression. While speculative, studies in Russia on “plasma-assisted combustion and MHD” for hypersonics (e.g. the AJAX concept) have suggested such techniques could control shock structure and boundary layer behavior. The oblique detonation wave engine (ODWE) is another concept where instead of a normal shock and flamefront, a stabilized oblique shock is used for combustion. Adapting some of that knowledge, our electric system might aim to stabilize an oblique shock/heat release ahead of the fans to reduce the burden on the blades. Even without combustion, an oblique shock could be held at a fixed position by a clever geometry or plasma interaction, allowing the airflow to detonate or just to compress in a controlled way before reaching the fan stages.
In summary, the thermal feasibility hinges on aggressive cooling strategies and materials. The system would likely require a closed-loop active cooling using cryogenic fluid – which implies the vehicle must carry a significant volume of coolant (for example, liquid hydrogen that might double as a fuel for a rocket mode or fuel cells). This adds weight, but it’s the price for keeping the engine from melting. Managing shock-induced heating and using every trick (pre-cooling, boundary layer bleed, plasma) will be needed to keep component temperatures within survivable limits. This is a major technological leap; however, the recent success of Reaction Engines’ pre-cooler at Mach 5 gives confidence that rapid heat exchangers can be built for extreme conditions. We’d be looking at extending that kind of technology by a factor of ~3 in inlet temperature, which is daunting but conceivably could be tackled with staged cooling or future materials (like micro-structured heat exchangers and perhaps endothermic chemical heat absorption using fuel).
From a structural standpoint, building an engine that contains multiple motor-driven stages and survives hypersonic flight requires innovation in both design and materials. Key points include:
Hollow-core motor integration: A multi-stage electric fan would ideally use a rim-driven motor for each stage – meaning magnets or conductors on the fan’s outer ring and stator coils in a surrounding structure – to avoid a heavy shaft. This leaves the center of the engine mostly open (hollow core). The S-MAGJET concept explicitly highlights this benefit: without shafts or gearboxes, “a ‘hollow-core shaft-less’ tunnel is left in the center of the turbine”, allowing additional airflow or other uses. For our design, this open core could pass extra bypass air (for cooling or thrust augmentation) or house a flow straightening spike. The lack of a central shaft also means we remove a major weight contributor and something that normally limits how you arrange stages. Each stage can be mounted in a frame but otherwise float independently, connected only by power cables and perhaps structural struts. This flexibility might let us stagger or offset stages to optimize aerodynamics.
Weight minimization: Despite removing shafts, the engine will still contend with the weight of multiple motors, power cables, and cooling systems. Using lightweight high-strength materials is vital. Motor components can use HTS wires which carry current with no resistive losses (if kept cold), thus eliminating heavy copper windings. The casings and supports likely need to be titanium or composite for high strength-to-weight. Every gram in the rotating assembly is subject to huge centrifugal force at high RPM, so blades and rotor rings must be as light as possible. Modern carbon-fiber composite fan blades (used in commercial turbofans) offer a template – they are lighter than metal and can be layered for strength, though their behavior at very high temperature is a concern (perhaps coatings or CMC blades would be needed in hot stages).
Mechanical integrity at high RPM: The tip speeds of these fans will be extreme. Even at Mach 3 or 4 relative flow, a large diameter fan could see tip speeds well into the supersonic regime. The structural design must prevent blade flutter and fatigue from vibrations. Additionally, any asymmetric load (e.g. from a shock hitting one side of the fan disk) could induce vibrations. Active blade pitch control might be one way to alleviate stresses – for example, a blade that can change pitch could shed load if it senses a shock or high force. This however adds mechanical complexity and actuation systems that need to survive hypersonic conditions.
Thermal expansion and stress: The structure will face thermal gradients (hot on the outside where airflow hits, cooler inside if cooled, etc.). Differential expansion could cause misalignment between the rotor and stator of the motors. We’ll need thermal-tolerant clearances and possibly flexible supports that allow the motor rings to expand without seizing or losing alignment. High-temperature superconductors, if used, typically operate at 20–50 K for best performance – obviously impossible to maintain in a hot environment without heavy insulation. Likely the superconducting coils would be deeply buried in insulation and actively cooled, while the immediate structure around the airflow is a hot, separate layer. This suggests a sort of nested structure: an inner cold structure holding the motors, shielded by thermal barriers, and an outer hot structure exposed to airflow. The gap in between might be where coolant or bypass air flows to keep temperatures in check.
Integration with airframe: A “ductless” fan system might be spread across an airframe or concentrated in one module. Without a duct, the fans could ingest boundary layer air or be affected by the vehicle’s external flow – so placement is important (maybe on the nose or leading edges where flow is relatively undisturbed). Structurally, mounting multiple heavy rotating machines in an airframe that will undergo maneuvers is non-trivial. Vibration isolation, as well as containing the rotor in case of a blade burst, needs attention (rotor burst at these energies can be catastrophic). Traditional engines have containment rings; an unducted fan would still need a containment shield around each stage for safety, which adds weight. Alternatively, designing blades that fray rather than shatter at failure (as some composite fan blades are designed) could mitigate this risk.
In light of the above, a viable design will exploit the hollow shaft-less architecture to save weight and perhaps improve airflow, use super-strong lightweight materials (superalloys, composites, high-temp ceramics) for all components, and incorporate cooling and flexibility to handle thermal and mechanical loads. The HyperMach team claimed that by removing heavy shafts/gearboxes and using light superconducting motors, their engine architecture achieves unprecedented performance and leaves more space for air flow. That hints that structurally, an electric approach can indeed be competitive if executed right. Still, at Mach 15 the structural loads (both static and dynamic) are beyond anything in today’s engines. This is an area needing extensive analysis and possibly new testing methods (spin tests at high temperature, etc.) to validate that the rotating assemblies can survive the environment.
Given the novel and extreme nature of this concept, validation will rely on advanced computational modeling and carefully planned experiments. A multi-stage hypersonic electric fan involves fluid dynamics, structural dynamics, heat transfer, and electromagnetics all tightly coupled. Traditional engine design tools (CFD for airflow, finite element for stress, circuit simulators for electrical systems) will need to be linked in a multi-physics simulation. One can foresee creating high-fidelity models that simulate, for example, the intake airflow, the formation of shocks, the forces on each blade, the motor torque, the heating of the coils, and the real-time control adjustments – a truly complex “digital twin” of the engine. Developing such a simulation will itself be a significant project, likely requiring supercomputing resources. The payoff is that we could iterate designs in silico and identify showstoppers or needed tweaks (like discovering that a certain RPM causes an unstable shock oscillation, etc.). Computational Fluid Dynamics will be especially critical in mapping out the inlet design and shock system needed to supply the fans with manageable airflow at high Mach. Decades of scramjet research would inform these models; as NASA’s Hyper-X (X-43) program showed, extensive wind tunnel and CFD work was a prerequisite to a successful hypersonic engine flight.
On the experimental side, validation will likely proceed stepwise:
Throughout these steps, extensive instrumentation and data analysis will guide refinements. Modern telemetry can give real-time blade vibration data, motor temperatures, etc., even in a hypersonic test article, allowing engineers to compare against models and adjust designs. It’s worth noting that no air-breathing engine has ever operated at Mach 15 in practice – the record is the X-43 scramjet at Mach 9.6 for a few seconds. So, experimental validation will be breaking new ground. Collaboration with hypersonic wind tunnel facilities and possibly developing new test rigs (like combined thermal-electric test stands) will be necessary.
In summary, the path to validating this concept is a gradual one that blends high-fidelity simulation with incremental hardware demonstrations. We will likely rely heavily on computational predictions initially (given the cost and risk of jumping straight to Mach 15 flight tests). Confidence in the concept will grow as we successfully test at Mach 5, then Mach 7, and so forth. By leveraging the latest simulation techniques and by carefully designing experiments to isolate each challenge (aerodynamic, thermal, electrical), we can systematically retire risks. This multi-pronged validation strategy ensures that when substantial resources are committed to a full-scale hypersonic prototype, the underlying technology has been proven in principle.
It is telling that despite the allure of the idea, a multi-stage electric hypersonic fan system has scant presence in past research literature. This propulsion concept treads into a largely unexplored territory at the intersection of high-speed aerodynamics and advanced electrical engineering. Here we discuss why it hasn’t been studied before, how it fills gaps in current hypersonic research, and why new modeling approaches are required.
Why hasn’t this been studied before? In previous decades, the prerequisites for this concept simply did not exist. Electrified aircraft propulsion is itself a relatively new field (focused mostly on subsonic efficiency and urban air mobility) and was long deemed impractical for larger aircraft due to weight. Early studies noted that electric motors didn’t offer advantages over combustion engines because of heavy motors and losses in converting power back and forth. The idea of using electric motors in a high-speed engine would have been dismissed due to inadequate power density and control technology. Additionally, traditional hypersonic research communities have been centered on combustion-based propulsion (ramjets, scramjets, rockets). The notion of a hypersonic “propeller” driven by electricity falls outside those well-trodden paths, meaning it didn’t naturally attract funding or attention. There’s also a historical separation between aerospace engineers and electrical engineers – until recently, there were few cross-disciplinary efforts marrying high-power electrical systems with atmospheric flight engines. Lastly, any concept for Mach 15 flight was so far-fetched that only chemical rockets were seriously considered. Air-breathing options were limited to scramjets or maybe combined cycle engines (like turbine-based combined cycles, which pair a turbojet with a ramjet). An electric-driven cycle would have been seen as adding complexity to an already extremely hard problem. It is only now, with some successful demonstrations of components (like superconducting aviation motors, or turboelectric prototypes by Astro Mechanica), that this idea seems remotely plausible to revisit.
Gaps in current hypersonic research: The state-of-the-art hypersonic propulsion systems each have limitations that the electric ductless fan concept seeks to address. Scramjet engines, for instance, have demonstrated high speed capability (X-51 WaveRider cruised at Mach 5 for 210 seconds in 2013), but scramjets struggle with fuel-air mixing and ignition times – at Mach 5+, the air passes through the engine in milliseconds, making stable combustion extremely difficult. This fundamentally limits scramjet operability and has resulted in short burn durations and very high development cost for incremental speed gains. Turbine-based combined cycle (TBCC) engines (like the Pratt & Whitney J58 in the SR-71 or modern concepts by Hermeus) attempt to cover multiple regimes by physically integrating different engine modes – e.g. a turbojet for low speed and a ramjet for high speed. While promising, TBCCs become heavy and mechanically complex, and transitioning between modes is risky (Hermeus’ recent tests showed a successful mode transition at Mach 3+ on a prototype, but this is a long way from a practical Mach 5 airplane). Moreover, scramjets and TBCC still ultimately rely on combustion; they hit a wall in terms of efficiency at lower speeds (scramjets can’t operate below ~Mach 4) and heat loading at high speeds (even the best scramjet materials have trouble beyond Mach ~10 due to temperature). Rocket-based combined cycles (RBCC), like Reaction Engines’ SABRE, use a precooled turbojet up to Mach 5.5 and then switch to rockets. This addresses the scramjet’s low-speed issue but still cedes the high-speed regime to rocket power, essentially because beyond Mach 5 the turbo machinery can’t cope with the heat without heavy precoolers. In all these approaches, electrical propulsion has not been considered a viable player – primarily because of the power source problem (where would the energy come from?) and secondarily because of presumed inefficiency (why carry an electric generator when combustion can directly produce thrust?). As a result, there is a gap in research: virtually no studies have tried to design an engine that uses electric motors to compress air at hypersonic speeds. This concept covers that gap by proposing a new paradigm – using external energy (electricity) to do what fuel combustion would normally do, thereby potentially bypassing the combustion kinetics problem and some limitations of thermodynamics.
Need for new multi-physics modeling: Because this concept straddles multiple domains, new modeling and simulation approaches are needed. Traditional engine design has well-established tools: turbomachinery CFD for compressors, separate codes for ramjet intakes and nozzles, etc. An electric hypersonic fan doesn’t fit neatly into any existing tool. For example, if one wanted to simulate it, one must combine:
Furthermore, plasma and ionization effects could become important at the high end of Mach 15. Air might ionize in strong shocks, which means a standard CFD (which usually assumes no ionization or chemical reactions in the intake) may not be accurate. This drifts into the realm of plasma physics and magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). If we consider using electromagnetic fields to assist flow as mentioned, then one has to simulate charged particle dynamics and the coupling of electric fields with the flow – a speciality field on its own. Very few aerospace projects (apart from perhaps nuclear thermal or plasma thrusters in space, which are at much lower densities) have required such coupling. The tools to do all this exist in research (for example, MHD codes used for plasma thrusters, or codes for reentry vehicles that handle ionized flow for communications blackout prediction), but combining them with an engine simulation is uncharted territory.
In essence, pursuing this concept will push the boundaries of simulation and require new theoretical research. It’s not just about building a new engine, it’s also about developing the methodologies to predict how it will behave. This is both a challenge and an opportunity: by exploring this, we might develop far better multi-physics tools that can benefit many areas of aerospace engineering. The very novelty of the concept means we have to answer questions that haven’t been asked before, like “How does a strong magnetic field interact with a hypersonic boundary layer?” or “Can a fan stage generate useful thrust in a mostly subsonic jet core with a supersonic bypass stream around it?” – these reside in the blank spaces of current research.
While no one has built an engine exactly like this before, many prior research developments provide stepping stones that justify giving this concept serious consideration now. Advances in electric propulsion, high-speed aerodynamics, and materials all contribute to the argument that this idea, previously infeasible, may now be within reach. Additionally, lessons from past hypersonic programs and emerging technologies highlight what to do differently to make an electric hypersonic propulsion system viable.
Enabling advances in electric propulsion and power systems: Over the last decade, there have been leaps in the power-to-weight ratio of electric motors and generators, largely due to better materials (e.g. rare-earth magnets, high-temperature superconductors) and power electronics. As noted, HTS motors could achieve order-of-magnitude improvements in specific power, making it conceivable to have multi-megawatt motors on an aircraft. Companies like Airbus and Boeing are actively researching 2–3 MW class electric motors for aircraft (for example, a joint effort by Airbus and Toshiba aims for a 2 MW superconducting motor for future airliners), which would have seemed science fiction 20 years ago. In parallel, energy storage and generation techniques have improved: while batteries are still far from what we’d need for Mach 15, alternative sources like fuel cells or turbo-generators have matured. Astro Mechanica’s engine uses a turbine to generate electricity which then drives a fan and compressor. This essentially proves the concept of splitting the traditional engine cycle: they run a combustor/turbine purely to produce electric power, and use that to drive the “cold” part of the engine. Our design could use a similar approach at lower speeds or for initial acceleration – for instance, a small onboard gas turbine or even a compact nuclear reactor (in a far future scenario) to generate the needed electric power. The concept of fusion-electric propulsion studied in the 1990s (by Bussard, etc.) suggested that if a high-density energy source like a fusion reactor were available, hypersonic aircraft could double their payload and halve takeoff weight. We obviously don’t have fusion reactors yet, but we do have steadily improving power electronics (e.g. the advent of SiC MOSFETs that can handle hundreds of kilowatts in small packages), which means we can switch and manage megawatt-level power in flight. This convergence of motor and power tech means the core assumption of an electric engine – that we can supply enormous power to it at manageable weight – is more valid now than ever.
High-speed aerodynamics & propulsion experience: The proposed system stands on the shoulders of prior hypersonic efforts. Scramjet programs like NASA’s X-43A and the Air Force’s X-51 have shown that air-breathing flight is achievable to nearly Mach 10, and they’ve mapped out many pitfalls (e.g., how to start combustion in supersonic flow, how to shape inlets for optimal shock capture, etc.). One takeaway from scramjets is that hydrogen fuel was necessary for Mach 9+ because of its fast combustion; in our concept, we circumvent combustion speed limits altogether by using electric power. That addresses one fundamental scramjet issue: combustion residence time. If fuel doesn’t have to burn in milliseconds (because we’re not burning fuel in air in the core engine), we remove a major failure mode. In that sense, the electric ductless fan concept is an outgrowth of scramjet research – it’s like a scramjet that has had its combustor replaced by an electrically driven compression stage. The X-43A Hyper-X was a “high-risk, high-payoff” project, and it succeeded by careful engineering and step-by-step risk reduction. We would adopt a similar mentality for our concept, using what was learned about hypersonic intakes and materials from X-43/X-51.
Another relevant line of research is in combined cycle engines. The SR-71’s J58 engine, for example, operated as a turbojet up to Mach ~3.2 and then progressively shifted to acting like a ramjet (by bypassing more flow directly to the afterburner). This showed that an engine can morph operation mode as speed increases. Modern projects like Hermeus’s Quarterhorse are pursuing a TBCC that transitions between a turbojet and a pure ramjet around Mach 3–4. This validates the idea that one can bridge the gap between jet engines and ramjets. Our electric fan system could be seen as an extreme evolution of an adaptive cycle engine – one that transitions from turbojet-like (fan-driven compression) to ramjet-like (shock compression, with maybe fans idling or windmilling) as Mach increases. The Hermeus engine test in 2022, where the engine “successfully transitioned from turbojet to ramjet operation”, is a proof of concept that designing for multi-regime operation is possible with modern engineering tools and rapid prototyping. We can leverage similar approaches (e.g., ground testing in a wind tunnel with a moving inlet spike) when developing our engine.
The Reaction Engines SABRE program provides justification on the thermal management front. SABRE tackled the issue of Mach 5 flight by incorporating a precooler that takes extremely hot intake air and cools it to levels a turbojet can handle. The fact that by 2019 they “achieved Mach 5 equivalent conditions” on the ground and are now into core testing means that technology for handling high-temperature airflow is maturing. Our concept would likely need an analogous thermal management system – possibly multiple precoolers in series or a more advanced cryogenic cooling cycle. SABRE also teaches an important lesson: they stop air-breathing at Mach ~5.5, switching to rocket mode beyond. This is because even with precooling, a turbo-compressor beyond that speed may not be feasible. This underscores that to go beyond Mach 5–6 air-breathing, one must try a radically different approach – which is exactly what our electric fan is. Instead of giving up on air-breathing after Mach 5, we attempt to push it further by eliminating the combustion part that SABRE couldn’t avoid. We’ll apply SABRE’s heat exchanger know-how to keep our fans cool, effectively combining their precooler tech with a new electric compressor stage that takes the place of a rocket engine in the 5–10 Mach range. In essence, our concept could be seen as “SABRE + electric compressor instead of rocket from Mach 5 upward,” which sounds wild but is grounded in the incremental achievements Reaction Engines has made.
Additionally, a lot of progress has been made in computational tools and wind tunnel techniques at high Mach. In the 1960s, trying something like this would have been shooting in the dark; today we have CFD that, while not perfect, can reasonably predict shock interactions and even some combustion phenomena. We also have large databases from previous experiments (e.g. how certain intake shapes perform, how plasma injection can perturb a boundary layer, etc.). These all indirectly reduce the risk of exploring a new concept because we’re not starting from scratch on every aspect.
In conclusion, prior research gives us both caution and hope. We know the hurdles of hypersonics (from scramjet and combined-cycle programs), but we also have new tools in the toolbox (from electric propulsion advances). The multi-stage electric ductless fan is a bold synthesis of these strands, and it is precisely the confluence of recent progress in these disparate areas that provides a rational basis to investigate it now. Past efforts like X-43 and SABRE were stepping stones; now is the time to take the next step by exploring a concept that was previously out of reach. The potential rewards, as outlined, could drastically change aerospace travel and access to space.
As with any revolutionary concept, the multi-stage electric hypersonic fan carries both immense potential payoff and equally significant risks. A clear-eyed feasibility report must weigh these to determine if and how to proceed. Below we outline the benefits if successful, the major technological hurdles that must be addressed, and a proposed roadmap for development to manage risk while progressing toward a proof-of-concept.
High-Payoff Potential (Why Pursue It?):
Game-Changing Speed and Reusability: The foremost payoff is enabling reusable hypersonic flight. An aircraft powered by this system could theoretically take off from a runway, accelerate to Mach 10–15, and either cruise globally or serve as a launch platform for orbital insertion, then return and land. This is the kind of capability that collapses travel and launch costs by orders of magnitude. Imagine flying from New York to Sydney in under 2 hours, or reaching any point on the globe in <3 hours for military rapid response. This is beyond current aviation and even goes farther than concepts like Boeing’s Mach 5 passenger plane. It also could drastically reduce the cost of putting payloads in space – a reusable first stage that gets to Mach 15 and ~40 km altitude could replace the entire first stage of a rocket. Past analyses of air-breathing launch vehicles showed huge payload fraction gains; a fully electric drive could amplify those by not even expending fuel during the air-breathing climb (except whatever is used for electric generation).
Efficiency Across Regimes: Unlike a rocket that is efficient only in vacuum, or a scramjet that only works at high speed, this concept adapts to all flight phases. It could take off and cruise on electric power (potentially using energy stored or generated in flight) with no need for separate lift jets or boosters. If realized, this single-engine solution greatly simplifies vehicle design and operations. The multi-regime efficiency also means less compromise – the engine can operate near optimal point in subsonic, supersonic, and hypersonic flight by tuning the RPM of each stage, resulting in fuel/energy savings. In principle, an electric-driven engine wastes less energy than a combustion engine at off-design conditions because you can idle or turn off stages that aren’t needed rather than pumping airflow through an unneeded cycle.
Lower Emissions / Clean Technology: Should the electric power be drawn from a clean source (for example, onboard hydrogen fuel cells or ground-charged batteries or a renewable-sourced fuel powering a generator), the concept could drastically lower emissions for high-speed travel. Traditional rockets emit large amounts of CO₂ (if hydrocarbon) or water vapor/alumina in the stratosphere (if hydrogen or solid fuel), and scramjets usually burn hydrocarbon fuel producing CO₂ and NOx at high altitude. An electric system could be “greener”, especially if future technologies like solar power beaming or zero-carbon energy storage are in play. This aligns with the global push for sustainable aviation – even high-speed flight could have a smaller environmental footprint if done via electrification.
Military and Commercial Advantages: Success here would yield strategic advantages: hypersonic vehicles that are fully reusable and controllable can serve roles in rapid cargo delivery, surveillance, or even passenger transport. The platform could take off normally (giving flexibility and quick turnaround, unlike rocket launches that need pads and days of prep). For the commercial sector, being the first to offer ultra-fast passenger travel with aircraft-like operations (quick turnaround, reusability) could open a new market, much like how the Concorde opened supersonic travel – but at far greater speed and hopefully without Concorde’s economic drawbacks. Also, the technology spinoffs (in materials, motors, cooling) could benefit other aerospace products (like more efficient subsonic engines, or high-speed generators for other applications).
Payload and Performance Gains: If we consider a comparison to an all-rocket or all-scramjet system, an electric airbreather could carry more payload for the same takeoff weight because it doesn’t carry oxidizer and potentially can use energy more sparingly. A theoretical study indicated a hypersonic airliner with an advanced (fusion) electric propulsion could have payload ~4× larger for a given takeoff mass than one with a conventional propulsion. While fusion is speculative, the principle stands: improving propulsion efficiency directly translates to payload and range gains. If we achieve high efficiency, a vehicle might, for example, carry enough extra propellant to reach orbit single-stage (SSTO) – an elusive holy grail in aerospace. Even if not SSTO, the drop tanks or booster stages could be reduced.
Key Technological Risks and Hurdles: (What could prevent success?)
Roadmap for Proof-of-Concept and Development: (How to systematically realize the concept while managing risk)
Analytical & Computational Phase (1–3 years): Form a multi-disciplinary team and build detailed simulations of key subsystems (motor performance at high speed, hypersonic inlet flows, thermal management loops). Use these to iterate the design and identify “showstoppers” early. For example, analyze whether a two-stage precooler plus a given HTS motor design can handle Mach 7 airflow – if not, revise to perhaps include an MHD stage or limit Mach. During this phase, also perform trade studies on power sources (e.g., analyze if a turbogenerator burning hydrogen offers better energy per weight than a battery or fuel cell for a reference mission). The output of this phase is a refined concept with major risks quantified and decisions made on architecture (like will it be pure electric or turboelectric hybrid, how many fan stages, etc.).
Ground Technology Demonstrators (4–7 years): Develop and test critical components individually. For instance:
Each of these component tests retires some risk. By the end of this step, we should have confidence that each “piece” (fans, motors, cooling, power electronics) works in isolation under somewhat scaled conditions.
Integrated Prototype (Phase I) – Low-Hypersonic Flight Demo (8–12 years): Design a prototype engine intended for a Mach 5–7 flight test. This could be something like a modification to an existing hypersonic test vehicle or a new small experimental vehicle (perhaps the size of a missile or a small drone). The engine might use, for instance, a rocket boost to get to Mach 3, then the electric fans kick in with the inlet open, aiming to accelerate further. Because Mach 5–7 is a regime where scramjets are just coming online, demonstrating an electric-powered thrust in that realm would be a huge proof-of-concept. The prototype might not be pure electric – it could incorporate a small rocket or ram combustor to assist if needed – but it would primarily rely on the multi-stage fan and electrical power distribution. If it fails to produce net thrust, we learn and adjust. If it succeeds, even for a brief time, it’s a historic first. Data from this flight (pressures, temps, thrust levels) will validate or calibrate our models.
Integrated Prototype (Phase II) – Full-Scale Hypersonic Demonstrator (15–20 years): Assuming the Mach 5–7 demo is successful and shows that scaling to higher Mach is plausible, proceed to a full-scale demonstrator targeting Mach 10–15. By this time, some technologies will have matured further (maybe improved superconductors or lighter batteries, etc., given the rapid pace of those fields). This could be an X-plane project: a vehicle perhaps launched by a carrier aircraft or rocket to high altitude, then it engages its advanced electric engine to attempt sustained hypersonic cruise. The design will incorporate all lessons – likely a sophisticated inlet with preconditioning, multiple cooling stages, and possibly redundant motor stages. The goal is to break the Mach 10 barrier on electric power, and ideally reach into the Mach 12-15 range in a controlled manner. Achieving this would demonstrate the viability of the concept at its target performance. This step will be very expensive and challenging, but by now the incremental risk is lower thanks to earlier successes.
Staged Deployment and Spin-offs: Even before reaching Mach 15, the technologies developed can spin off into practical applications. For instance, a Mach 3–5 hybrid electric jetliner or business jet could use a simplified version of the tech to cruise supersonically with better efficiency (the market for supersonic civil transport may see this as attractive). The military might use a Mach 5–6 drone for reconnaissance using the turboelectric engine from Phase I. These spin-offs provide intermediate ROI and keep the momentum (and funding) for the more ambitious goals. Meanwhile, if the Mach 15 demonstrator succeeds, the path opens for an operational vehicle. That could be a reusable booster for space launch or a global-range hypersonic transport. Those products would be beyond the scope of this initial R&D program, but the outcome of our program would enable them.
Throughout the roadmap, it is crucial to maintain go/no-go decision gates. At each phase, if results indicate an insurmountable problem (e.g., if by year 7 we find that no material can survive the needed heat even with cooling, or the power needed is ten times higher than anticipated), we should be prepared to redirect or pause. However, a phased approach as outlined ensures that even partial progress yields valuable innovations (superconducting aerospace motors, new heat exchangers, etc.).
In conclusion, the multi-stage electric ductless fan for hypersonic flight is high-risk, high-reward personified. The engineering challenges are massive, ranging from shattering known thermal limits to orchestrating a symphony of electromagnetic and aerodynamic systems at Mach 15. Yet, the potential payoff – a quantum leap in air and space transportation capability – is so compelling that it warrants serious investigation. By leveraging prior advancements and tackling the problems in a structured, step-by-step manner, we can gather the knowledge to determine whether this audacious concept can be turned into reality. Even if the ultimate goal of Mach 15 proves too ambitious in the near term, the journey will produce intermediate technologies and insights that push the boundaries of propulsion engineering. Thus, pursuing this concept is justified not only by the dream of efficient hypersonic travel, but also by the innovation ecosystem it will create around electrified, high-speed flight – an area ripe for breakthroughs in the 21st century.
References: